JPMorgan
resigns as Corporate Trustee within 4 days after
receiving the following complaint letter:
E-mailed to
JPMorgan headquarters in New York and Chicago, the
assistant Attorney General and to the trustees.
The E-mail was send on 12.19.2008, late Friday
afternoon and the following Wednesday morning,
12.24.08 we received an E-mail indicating JPMorgan
Chase Bank desire to resign. Amazingly fast!
However, an investment reversal was denied.
Re: Investments
for the Family Trust Acc. 44........
Dear Richard and
Dave:
As trustees of
the ................. Trust I am asking you to
protect the assets of the trust.
Some of the investments made by R............G............,
as outlined below, are not suitable for asset
preservation.
On September 26, 2008, he invested the sum of
$ 594.404.57 in the market by purchasing a
variety of mutual funds and the remainder was
invested in JP Morgan Municipal Money
Market account.
The October 31
statement showed a loss of
$ 74.762.73 and
the November 30
statement showed a loss of $ 118,046.67
I was not given
the opportunity to research the investments,
as the investing was done very quickly on the
day after our meeting during a market rally. I
prefer safe tax-free investments.
Therefore, I am
requesting that both of you take an active
role in supervising the investment management
of the trust. I will hold JP Morgan
accountable for the losses resulting from the
mismanagement of the trust.
I hereby demand
that those mutual
fund investment transactions be
reversed before the end of the year.
This was my
second bad investment experience with JPMorgan
asset management.
A year ago I
opened a Managed
Account # H............
At this time,
during my senior years, I believe that a
moderate risk tolerance factor would be
appropriate and that is how I requested that
the account assets be invested. I requested
from the investment specialist at JP Morgan to
purchase certain investments. However, as I
found out later my requests were ignored. They
invested my valuable assets in some high-risk
and above average risk mutual funds. I was
shocked, as the first statement showed
substantial losses, thus complained to the JP
Morgan investment banker in charge of my
account. After my conversations with them, I
understood that they would make changes and
added $ 75,000 to the account.
I gave them
instructions to keep this money in cash
reserve. Yet, I later found out that without
my knowledge the money was invested the same
day, in a manner contrary to my previous
request not to invest.
In addition, six
out of the thirteen investments in my
portfolio are JP
Morgan funds. Subsequently, I believed
that this was not only a conflict of interest;
it was taking advantage of me and the money
that I trusted in their hands. When I was
aware of this, I made a request to change the
account in April of 2008 to a regular
brokerage account. However, now I am stuck
with those risky investments including the
accrued losses.
In September of
this year, a complaint was sent to JP Morgan's
Chief Investment Officer,............, located
in New York, NY 10154, 345 Park Avenue, asking
for a reversal of the transactions. He
contacted S............ at the B. H,...... JPMorgan Bank - to
address my concerns. A meeting followed on
October 17, 2008 with ........., Investment
specialist ............., ............ and
........... I was informed by ........... that
this is JP Morgan’s "Investment
Philosophy".
What leads to
this type of investing? Are banks just
interested in creating fees?
Why does JP
Morgan pursue those types of investment
practices and ignores their clients risk
factors?
I am requesting that those investment
transactions are reversed as well.
Best Regards,
.................
Date:
9.26.2008 - DOW 11.143 - up 121 points -
investments were bought during a rally
Highlights
from a Fund Analysis – most of them are not suitable for a
conservative investment approach. The above average risk factors -
‘Beta’ and some high expense
ratios are another negative factor.
APOLLO
Overseen
by the private equity firm of the same name, Apollo
Investment Corporation is essentially a fund that specializes
in investing in the debt and equity instruments of private, or
otherwise thinly traded, middle-market firms. While Apollo has been a
solid performer, we think its opportunities for growth are limited in
this environment. Additionally, aspects of its investment book may
portend future credit issues, which could impair Apollo’s ability to
maintain its dividend. Generally speaking, we would only advise an
investment in Apollo stock for those with a considerable appetite
for risk.
Valuation:
We are initiating our coverage of Apollo Investment Corporation with a
fair value estimate
of $9. We think the downturn is going to last at least through
mid-2010. In our opinion, Apollo's investment book suggests that
realized losses will trend to more than $140 million and cash flows
will shrink as the market works through the recession. If our scenario
comes to pass, a dividend cut will likely occur. Apollo's revenue
growth will also be constrained by some expected de leveraging and an
inability to access the capital markets for equity injections. We
doubt Apollo, or any BDC, will be able to raise equity at a premium to
book, and thus, project just 3% organic asset growth once the
recession subsides in 2011. That said, we like Apollo's secured
funding, which will allow it to maintain reasonably high net
interest margins of around 7% until the revolver comes due in
2011. Afterward, we expect the firm to lose approximately 50 basis
points off its net
interest margin. Finally, we price in a 15% chance that the BDC
space may become unviable in the future. Our assumptions bake in a 12%
cost of equity.
Comment:
Fair
value estimates is $ 9.00 a share. The family trust paid $
13.180 a share
Beta
1.09 - Morningstar rating: 3 stars
Dodge
& Cox
International
For
the year to date through Oct. 15, 2008, the fund is behind three
fourths of its peers and is well behind the benchmark. It has lost
46.2% over that span.
1.
One of the fund's managers, Diana Strandberg, says recent
underperformance owes partly to purchases she and her colleagues made
gradually over the past year or so, as prices dropped and then dropped
some more. In particular, she pointed to additions in
developed-markets financials--a sector the portfolio had underweighted--as
well as emerging-markets financials, a stake that already had been
relatively high. Both moves have hurt. One name hurt more than most: American
International Group AIG.
The
insurance giant was 1.9% of the portfolio at the end of June 2008
(down to about 0.4% in the Sept. 30 portfolio). Another top holding, Royal
Bank of Scotland RBS,
has
also plummeted in value
Comment:
AIG
and RBS should have been sold prior to their collapse.
Morningstar:
downgraded from 5 to 3 stars
Fidelity
Advisor High Income Advantage I is not for the timid.
8.17.2008
As
we've stressed in the past, this fund can look quite intrepid relative
to other high-yield
bond funds. Manager Tom Soviero runs a concentrated portfolio,
and he'll hold hefty stakes in the lowest-quality issues and
equities, making the fund more susceptible to issue-specific credit
trouble and general market swings than most. Those risks have
taken center stage lately, as weakness in top holdings like Charter
Communications and
Six Flags a
slumping stock market, and an overall flight to quality have taken
their toll here. Its 5.9% loss for the year through Aug. 15, 2008,
ranks behind all but a few peers.
Other
factors, including poor manager ownership and an insufficiently
independent board, bring its overall grade down to middling territory
Those
seeking pure high-yield exposure in a more moderate package should
look elsewhere.
Takes
on more credit risk than most high-yield offerings, which means it can
suffer disproportionately when the high-yield market or the economy
weakens. - Morningstar rating: 2 stars
Return to Home Page
Harbor
International Instl
8.13.2008
Bias
toward financial, consumer-goods, and industrial-materials names leads
to problems at times. Opportunistic value discipline and blue-chip
bias can slow the fund in go-go growth rallies and hard-core smal-cap
surges.
Taste
for emerging-markets names comes with risks.
Third
Avenue Value
Since
the spring of 2008, this fund has seen steady shareholder redemptions.
Manager Marty Whitman, in fact, reports that many of the fund's recent
security sales are to meet redemptions. (He also says that some of the
sales are for tax purposes; he is working hard to not pay a capital
gain in 2008.)
While
we understand that big losses can be tough to handle--the fund's 31%
setback for the year to date through Sept. 29, 2008, reaches territory
never before seen at this fund-- redemptions today could also prevent
the fund from realizing big gains in the future.
Risks:
Stakes
in foreign holding companies subject to special tax rules may make
this fund less tax-efficient going forward.
Morningstar
rating: 3 stars - Expense ratio: 1.08 %
JPMorgan
U.S. Real Estate Fund
Specialty-Real
Estate
Morningstar
rating: 3 stars
- Beta: 1.43 -
Expense ratio: 0.93 %
FMI
Large Cap
The
fund is likely to lag its peers during growth-led rallies.
A
concentrated portfolio adds to potential risk (holding of 20 stocks)
Morningstar rating: 5 stars, however the expense
ratio is 1 % - current yield a very low 0.88%
Comment:
Inception: 2002 – no track record
The fund invests with a long-term outlook, therefore there are no
benefits to me.
JPMorgan
Highbridge HSKSX
Expense
ratio: 1.71 % - Beta: 2.44
Comment:
Inception:
11.30.2005 – no track record
Nuveen
Tradewinds Value
Expense
ratio: 1.14 – Beta: above average (1year: 1.02 – 3 year 1.31)
The
investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund invests
primarily in equity securities of companies domiciled in the United
States, but may invest up to 35% of assets in U.S dollar denominated
equity securities of foreign companies, including up to 10% of the
funds assets invested in equity securities of companies domiciled in
emerging-markets.
Comment:
Inception
12.9.2004 – no track record
IShares
Tr Russell 1000 Growth
The
trust payed too much for it. Yield: 1.44 % - Risk 1.05 Beta
comment:
If
you like to take a risk with an ETF, you may buy
some recession proof
stocks like
JNJ
– Johnson & Johnson, growth and yield are much better than IWF
and Beta is only 0.51
SPDR
Gold Ttrust EFT
Yield:
0.00 - Comment: The commodity Gold is too speculative and the
price could plunge down very quick.
Investments for Account:
# H77475004
Half of the investing started
November 29. 2007, the remainder was invested January 2nd. 2008
However, the assets were invested in some hig-risk and above
average risk funds:
FAHCX - Fidelity High Income - Morningstar
risk factor: high
HAINX - Harbor International Instit. - high risk and 0.82 exp.
ratio
HMCAX - Eagle Midcap - low risk,
4.75% front load and 1.13 expense ratio
JPIAX - JPM Intrepid America - above average risk
JPGSX - JPM Intrepid Growth Select - Beta 1.04
JISIX - JPM Intrepid International
Sel. - average - 1.25 expense ratio
JLPSX - JPM Large cap core Plus Sel. - above average risk
SUIEX - JPM US Real Estate Sel. - above average risk
PRASX - TRowe Price New Asia - high risk and 0.93 expense ratio
TVIFX - Thornburg Value I - above average risk
TAVFX - Third Vavenue Value - average risk - 1.08 expense ratio
JGASX - JPM Growth Advantage - Beta
1.19 - above average
FAHCX and PRASX are still in my
posession, but have been transferred to a different account
|