JPMorgan resigns as Corporate Trustee within 4 days after receiving the following complaint letter:

E-mailed to JPMorgan headquarters in New York and Chicago, the assistant Attorney General and to the trustees.
The E-mail was send on 12.19.2008, late Friday afternoon and the following Wednesday morning, 12.24.08 we received an E-mail indicating JPMorgan Chase Bank desire to resign. Amazingly fast! However, an investment reversal was denied.


Re: Investments for the Family Trust Acc. 44........
Dear Richard and Dave:
As trustees of the ................. Trust I am asking you to protect the assets of the trust.
Some of the investments made by R............G............, as outlined below, are not suitable for asset preservation.

On September 26, 2008, he invested the sum of $ 594.404.57 in the market by purchasing a variety of mutual funds and the remainder was invested in JP Morgan Municipal Money Market account.
The October 31 statement showed a loss of     $ 74.762.73 and
the November 30 statement showed a loss of $ 118,046.67
I was not given the opportunity to research the investments, as the investing was done very quickly on the day after our meeting during a market rally. I prefer safe tax-free investments.
Therefore, I am requesting that both of you take an active role in supervising the investment management of the trust. I will hold JP Morgan accountable for the losses resulting from the mismanagement of the trust.
I hereby demand that those mutual fund investment transactions be reversed before the end of the year.
This was my second bad investment experience with JPMorgan asset management.
 
A year ago I opened a Managed Account # H............
At this time, during my senior years, I believe that a moderate risk tolerance factor would be appropriate and that is how I requested that the account assets be invested. I requested from the investment specialist at JP Morgan to purchase certain investments. However, as I found out later my requests were ignored. They invested my valuable assets in some high-risk and above average risk mutual funds. I was shocked, as the first statement showed substantial losses, thus complained to the JP Morgan investment banker in charge of my account. After my conversations with them, I understood that they would make changes and added $ 75,000 to the account.
I gave them instructions to keep this money in cash reserve. Yet, I later found out that without my knowledge the money was invested the same day, in a manner contrary to my previous request not to invest.
 
In addition, six out of the thirteen investments in my portfolio are JP Morgan funds. Subsequently, I believed that this was not only a conflict of interest; it was taking advantage of me and the money that I trusted in their hands. When I was aware of this, I made a request to change the account in April of 2008 to a regular brokerage account. However, now I am stuck with those risky investments including the accrued losses.
 
In September of this year, a complaint was sent to JP Morgan's Chief Investment Officer,............, located in New York, NY 10154, 345 Park Avenue, asking for a reversal of the transactions. He contacted S............ at the B. H,......  JPMorgan Bank - to address my concerns. A meeting followed on October 17, 2008 with ........., Investment specialist ............., ............ and ........... I was informed by ........... that this is JP Morgan’s "Investment Philosophy".
 
What leads to this type of investing? Are banks just interested in creating fees?
Why does JP Morgan pursue those types of investment practices and ignores their clients risk factors?

I am requesting that those investment transactions are reversed as well.
 
Best Regards,
.................
  

 

 

FAMILY TRUST INVESTMENTS

Date: 9.26.2008 - DOW 11.143 -  up 121 points - investments were bought during a rally

Highlights from a Fund Analysis – most of them are not suitable for a conservative investment approach. The above average risk factors - ‘Beta’ and some high expense ratios are another negative factor.

 

APOLLO

Overseen by the private equity firm of the same name, Apollo Investment Corporation is essentially a fund that specializes in investing in the debt and equity instruments of private, or otherwise thinly traded, middle-market firms. While Apollo has been a solid performer, we think its opportunities for growth are limited in this environment. Additionally, aspects of its investment book may portend future credit issues, which could impair Apollo’s ability to maintain its dividend. Generally speaking, we would only advise an investment in Apollo stock for those with a considerable appetite for risk.

 

Valuation: We are initiating our coverage of Apollo Investment Corporation with a fair value estimate of $9. We think the downturn is going to last at least through mid-2010. In our opinion, Apollo's investment book suggests that realized losses will trend to more than $140 million and cash flows will shrink as the market works through the recession. If our scenario comes to pass, a dividend cut will likely occur. Apollo's revenue growth will also be constrained by some expected de leveraging and an inability to access the capital markets for equity injections. We doubt Apollo, or any BDC, will be able to raise equity at a premium to book, and thus, project just 3% organic asset growth once the recession subsides in 2011. That said, we like Apollo's secured funding, which will allow it to maintain reasonably high net interest margins of around 7% until the revolver comes due in 2011. Afterward, we expect the firm to lose approximately 50 basis points off its net interest margin. Finally, we price in a 15% chance that the BDC space may become unviable in the future. Our assumptions bake in a 12% cost of equity.

Comment:
Fair value estimates is $ 9.00 a share. The family trust paid $ 13.180 a share
Beta 1.09 - Morningstar rating: 3 stars

 

Dodge & Cox International

For the year to date through Oct. 15, 2008, the fund is behind three fourths of its peers and is well behind the benchmark. It has lost 46.2% over that span.

1. One of the fund's managers, Diana Strandberg, says recent underperformance owes partly to purchases she and her colleagues made gradually over the past year or so, as prices dropped and then dropped some more. In particular, she pointed to additions in developed-markets financials--a sector the portfolio had underweighted--as well as emerging-markets financials, a stake that already had been relatively high. Both moves have hurt. One name hurt more than most: American International Group AIG.

The insurance giant was 1.9% of the portfolio at the end of June 2008 (down to about 0.4% in the Sept. 30 portfolio). Another top holding, Royal Bank of Scotland RBS, has also plummeted in value

Comment:

AIG and RBS should have been sold prior to their collapse.

Morningstar: downgraded from 5 to 3 stars

 

Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage I is not for the timid.
8.17.2008

As we've stressed in the past, this fund can look quite intrepid relative to other high-yield bond funds. Manager Tom Soviero runs a concentrated portfolio, and he'll hold hefty stakes in the lowest-quality issues and equities, making the fund more susceptible to issue-specific credit trouble and general market swings than most. Those risks have taken center stage lately, as weakness in top holdings like Charter Communications  and Six Flags  a slumping stock market, and an overall flight to quality have taken their toll here. Its 5.9% loss for the year through Aug. 15, 2008, ranks behind all but a few peers.

Other factors, including poor manager ownership and an insufficiently independent board, bring its overall grade down to middling territory

Those seeking pure high-yield exposure in a more moderate package should look elsewhere.

Takes on more credit risk than most high-yield offerings, which means it can suffer disproportionately when the high-yield market or the economy weakens. - Morningstar rating: 2 stars


Return to Home Page 
Harbor International Instl
8.13.2008

Bias toward financial, consumer-goods, and industrial-materials names leads to problems at times. Opportunistic value discipline and blue-chip bias can slow the fund in go-go growth rallies and hard-core smal-cap surges.

Taste for emerging-markets names comes with risks.

 

Third Avenue Value

Since the spring of 2008, this fund has seen steady shareholder redemptions. Manager Marty Whitman, in fact, reports that many of the fund's recent security sales are to meet redemptions. (He also says that some of the sales are for tax purposes; he is working hard to not pay a capital gain in 2008.)

While we understand that big losses can be tough to handle--the fund's 31% setback for the year to date through Sept. 29, 2008, reaches territory never before seen at this fund-- redemptions today could also prevent the fund from realizing big gains in the future.
Risks:

Stakes in foreign holding companies subject to special tax rules may make this fund less tax-efficient going forward.

Morningstar rating: 3 stars - Expense ratio: 1.08 %

 

JPMorgan U.S. Real Estate Fund

Specialty-Real Estate

Morningstar rating: 3 stars  -  Beta: 1.43  -  Expense ratio: 0.93 %

 

 

FMI Large Cap

 

The fund is likely to lag its peers during growth-led rallies.

A concentrated portfolio adds to potential risk (holding of 20 stocks)


Morningstar rating: 5 stars, however the expense ratio is 1 %  - current yield a very low 0.88%

Comment: Inception: 2002 – no track record
The fund invests with a long-term outlook, therefore there are no benefits to me.


JPMorgan Highbridge HSKSX

Expense ratio: 1.71 % - Beta: 2.44

Comment:

Inception: 11.30.2005 – no track record

 

 

Nuveen Tradewinds Value

 

Expense ratio: 1.14 – Beta: above average (1year: 1.02 – 3 year 1.31)

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund invests primarily in equity securities of companies domiciled in the United States, but may invest up to 35% of assets in U.S dollar denominated equity securities of foreign companies, including up to 10% of the funds assets invested in equity securities of companies domiciled in emerging-markets. 

Comment:

Inception 12.9.2004 – no track record

 

IShares Tr Russell 1000 Growth

The trust payed too much for it. Yield: 1.44 % - Risk 1.05 Beta

comment:

If you like to take a  risk with an ETF, you may buy some recession proof stocks like

JNJ – Johnson & Johnson, growth and yield are much better than IWF and Beta is only 0.51

 

 

SPDR Gold Ttrust EFT
Yield: 0.00 - Comment: The commodity Gold is too speculative and the price could plunge down very quick. 

  
 
Investments for Account: # H77475004
Half of the investing started November 29. 2007, the remainder was invested January 2nd. 2008

However, the assets were invested in some hig-risk and above average risk funds:
FAHCX - Fidelity High Income - Morningstar risk factor: high
HAINX - Harbor International Instit. - high risk and 0.82 exp. ratio
HMCAX - Eagle Midcap - low risk, 4.75% front load and 1.13 expense ratio
JPIAX - JPM Intrepid America - above average risk
JPGSX - JPM Intrepid Growth Select - Beta 1.04
JISIX - JPM Intrepid International Sel. - average - 1.25 expense ratio
JLPSX - JPM Large cap core Plus Sel. - above average risk
SUIEX - JPM US Real Estate Sel. - above average risk
PRASX - TRowe Price New Asia - high risk and 0.93 expense ratio
TVIFX - Thornburg Value I - above average risk
TAVFX - Third Vavenue Value - average risk - 1.08 expense ratio
JGASX - JPM Growth Advantage - Beta 1.19 - above average
 
FAHCX and PRASX are still in my posession, but have been transferred to a different account

 

 

Return to Home Page